| |
What your elected officials don't want you to know!
Welcome to our newest offering called, "It's Your Money!" On this page we will start to gather up and post all the government waste that's going
on from the federal level down to our own local municipalities. We will shine a spot light on how your hard earn taxdollars are continually being
wasted on everything from total mismanagement, frivalous, non-essential spending to complete, outright abuse!
We can use your help as well. If you witness, hear or read about any government waste not mentioned on this page we urge you to forward your findings
so that everyone who pays taxes will know how it is being wasted. Click here for details...
Our greatest hope and expectation is that this page will rarely be updated, but sadly, under 'one party rule', it will probably be updated often.
FEDERAL WASTE (This could fill volumes!)
Federal Workers Pocketed 'Fraudulent' Social Security Payments, GAO Finds
A government watchdog caught hundreds of federal employees who reaped millions in Social Security disability benefits!
August 04, 2010 | FoxNews.com
Hundreds of federal employees may have improperly reaped millions in Social Security disability benefits, according to a government watchdog that
caught workers at several major agencies pocketing fraudulent payments.
The Government Accountability Office issued a report that showed at least 1,500 federal employees may have wrongly received benefits. The group's
investigation, which focused on two Social Security programs for people who have limited incomes due to disabilities, found several specific cases
in which beneficiaries were earning well above the income cap while still receiving benefits. In one case, a Transportation Security Administration
screener was overpaid $108,000, according to the report.
"Our case studies ... confirmed some examples in which individuals received SSA disability payments that they were not entitled to receive," the GAO
said in a letter to Sens. Tom Carper, D-Del.; John McCain, R-Ariz.; and Tom Coburn, R-Okla. Some of the payments were attributed to fraud, others to
"administrative error," according to the report. The GAO found that the Social Security Administration does not use its own automated system to flag
workers who may be earning too much income to qualify for benefits.
Read more....
"SSA's internal controls did not prevent improper and fraudulent payments," the GAO said.
The report also found thousands of commercial drivers and transportation business owners who may be skirting the law. It focused in part on federal
employees, estimating that 1,500 workers were receiving about $1.7 million monthly. Of them, one-quarter were U.S. Postal Service employees and 16
percent were Defense Department civilians.
The report came with a DVD that showed employees double dipping -- by working and receiving benefits. The video showed overpayments to the TSA employee
as well as Postal Service workers.
According to the report, the TSA employee started receiving disability benefits in 1995 for "mood and anxiety disorders." But she started full-time work
in 2003 and earned as much as $50,000; the income cap after which disability payments are supposed to stop was $940 per month in 2008.
"Our investigation found that the beneficiary committed fraud in obtaining SSA disability payments," the report said. GAO said the employee told the
Social Security Administration she did not want the agency to contact her employer for work information and that she would submit a report herself,
though records indicate she never did. Her benefits have since been suspended.
In another case, an X-ray technician for the Department of Veterans Affairs in California was overpaid about $22,000. According to the report, the worker
started receiving payments in 2002 for an infection but continued to receive the money after returning to work in 2007. In yet another case, a Postal
Service worker in Michigan received an overpayment of about $45,000. That worker was approved for "mood and personality disorders" in 2004 but returned to
work later that year. The payments continued through early 2007, and then picked up again in late 2008. According to the report, a repayment of about
$37,000 was made in 2008.
Many of these workers received a $250 economic stimulus payment on top of the overpayments.
The report also found problems in the private sector. The GAO found 62,000 workers who received commercial driver's licenses after they were deemed eligible
for full disability benefits, "an indication that these individuals may no longer have serious medical conditions." The investigation revealed 7,900 people
with "registered transportation businesses" receiving the benefits. The GAO clarified that a more thorough investigation would be needed to see whether those
payments were fraudulent, improper or both.
The GAO suggested that the Social Security Administration start making better use of its automated system to catch overpayments in the future. The agency uses
the system to track increases in monthly earnings in order to compute changes in benefits payments, but it doesn't use the system to flag people who return to
work and may be eligible to have their benefits suspended.
Sourse: FoxNews.com -
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/08/04/federal-workers-pocketed-fraudulent-social-security-payments-watchdog-finds
Are Your Tax Dollars Going Toward A $62 Million ‘Tunnel to Nowhere’?
Reckless Ways Politians in Washington, D.C. Are Spending Your Stimulus Tax Dollars! McCain, Coburn: Stimulus Boondoggles Waste Millions
August 03, 2010 | NewsMax.com
The $862 billion stimulus bill that was supposed to rescue the American economy instead mired it in billions of ill-advised spending, two GOP
senators charged Tuesday.
Sen. Tom Coburn, R-Okla., and Sen. John McCain, R-Arizona, issued their latest report on the wasteful spending in the 2009 American Recovery
and Reinvestment Act.
Their report cites some 100 cases of wasted stimulus money. The senators report that "misdirected government spending" has actually hurt small
businesses in some cases by pulling them away from more productive activity.
Coburn and McCain provided several examples of legislative pork and wasteful spending in their "Summertime Blues" report, which is subtitled
"100 stimulus projects that give taxpayers the blues."
The Citizens Against Government Waste watchdog organization hailed the study on Tuesday. "President Obama talks incessantly about wasteful
government spending and reining in the budget deficit," CAGW President Tom Schatz said in a statement, "yet his policies do the opposite and
end up spending more taxpayer money than any previous president."
The top 10 most wasteful projects, according to the senators' report:
Show list.
- Over half a million dollars was spent to replace the windows in a visitor center at Mount St. Helens. The only problem is that
center closed nearly three years ago due to lack of use.
<-- Waste in our own backyard!
- Three-quarters of a million dollars went to the University of North Carolina at Charlotte to create a computerized dance-choreography
program. The university's overhead is 44 percent of the grant, the report stated.
- $62 million was allocated for the North Shore Connector, which provides light rail transportation to a casino and two sports stadiums
in Pittsburgh. In February 2009 Gov. Ed Rendell, a Democrat, called the project a "tragic mistake."
- $7.3 million for the construction of two fire stations in San Antonio, Texas. The senators report the city was about to build the
stations itself when the federal funding came along. Since then, compliance with federal regulations has caused so many delays no one
is sure now when the stations will be built, they say.
- Some $1.2 million was set aside to convert an abandoned train station into a museum in Glassboro, N.J. Federal authorities provided
$250,000 to buy the structure in 2002, but little or no work has been done there. Now they're going to invest another $1 million to
change the graffiti-riddled station, which was built in 1860, into a "museum and welcome center."
- Nearly $2 million is going to the California Academy of Sciences to send researchers to island in the Southwest Indian Ocean and to
East Africa to photograph ants. The pictures will be posted on a Web site devoted to ants.
- A $1.8 million road project in Ohio is being built so close to a pastor's house that it has cracked his foundation, and a massive
crane has struck his front porch twice.
- In 2004, the federal government provided $661,000 to refurbish the old Fitchburg Furnace building in Fitchburg, Ky. The treasurer of
the Friends of Fitchburg organization, however, says much of that money was lost due to "bad stewardship of money." Now, thanks to
the stimulus, the project is receiving another $350,000.
- In Kern County, Calif., the government is investing $308 million for a power plant to "generate more environmentally friendly
electricity by capturing carbon dioxide from the burning of fossil fuels." It's hard to see how the money will stimulate the economy …
groundbreaking isn't scheduled until December 2011.
- Folks in Boynton, Okla., are perplexed because their town won $89,298 to build a quarter-mile long sidewalk. The new sidewalk leads
to a ditch, and replaces one still in good condition that was built just five years ago.
The report also highlights two controversial studies of primates. Georgia State University researchers won $677,462 to compare how monkeys and
chimpanzees respond to "distributional inequality" and "unfairness." Another $72,623 went to Wake Forest University to study how monkeys react
under the influence of cocaine. Other wasteful spending from the stimulous bill where three-quarters of a million dollars went to the University
of North Carolina at Charlotte to create a computerized dance-choreography program. The university's overhead is 44 percent of the grant, the
report stated.
Sourse: NewsMax.com -
http://www.newsmax.com/InsideCover/mccain-coburn-stimulus-waste-summertime-blues/2010/08/03/id/366482
STATE WASTE
Millions spent on ferry generators that can’t be used
August 5, 2010 | By SUSANNAH FRAME | KING 5 News
SEATTLE - Inside a South Seattle warehouse, giant wooden crates contain an expensive mistake made by Washington State Ferries (WSF). Multi-million-dollar, high-powered generators that will never be used are sitting inside.
They were supposed to be installed on the ferries Kaleetan and Yakima. The new equipment would allow the boats to propel through the water using two engines instead of four. They were purchased to help save money on fuel costs.
Ferry design engineers conducted studies before ordering the new generators but they made a big mistake. They didn't do enough testing to realize the equipment would be too powerful to use on the boats. Connector cables on the two ferries can't handle generators that powerful. If installed they could cause an electrical explosion called an "arc flash." An arc flash is a short circuit through air that flashes over from one exposed live conductor to another conductor or to ground. There are studies estimating arc explosions cause one to two deaths per day in the U.S.
The KING 5 Investigators obtained an internal state memo which says the generators would create a "possible life-threatening incident… in locations where vessel personnel are likely to be present."
Without knowing about the potential danger, in 2006 WSF ordered nine generators from the Texas company TECO-Westinghouse.
Read more...
So far the state has paid $1 million for four of the nine. When problems cropped up, the state threw more money at the project.
In 2007, a million dollars was spent on a design change.
Last year, they spent $100,000 on consultants hired to find ways to fix the mistake.
So far the cost to taxpayers is $2.1 million. That number could grow to millions more to pay TECO-Westinghouse for work already performed.
In 2008, ferry engineers began to suspect the generators were too powerful to be used. The state hired the engineering firm Siemens Energy and Automation to conduct an analysis.
In February 2009, Siemens reported to WSF that, indeed, the switchgear on the boats could not handle that powerful of a generator.
State ferries didn’t scrap the project just yet. They hired another consultant - the Seattle-based naval architectural firm Guido Perla and Associates - to look for ways to allow the generators to interface safely with the cable connectors.
On April 28, 2010, Guido Perla reported to the ferry system that nothing could be done: "There is no viable, economically feasible device or technology that can safely (fix the problem)," wrote Perla engineers.
It wasn’t until three month later, in July, that state ferries officially told TECO-Westinghouse to pull the plug and stop all production.
Ferries Director of Vessel Maintenance Paul Brodeur signed off on the original order. He declined our requests for an interview.
KING-TV uncovered something else that’s troubling. The generators that are currently on the Kaleetan and the Yakima, and have been for ten years, have the same potential to cause an electrical explosion. Siemens Energy and Automation discovered and reported this safety concern to WSF a year-and-a-half ago.
Ferry officials tell us they're concerned but say nothing like that has ever happened and that their safety record is stellar. They also say that after a year-and-a-half, they're still working on a plan to solve the problem.
The Coast Guard tells KING 5 that just today WSF officials alerted them to the potential hazard and that they will be working with ferry engineers to mitigate the situation.
As for the unusable generators, four remain in boxes in a Seattle warehouse. The other five are at TECO-Westinghouse, nearly completed. It’s unclear how much the state will end up paying the manufacturer. The five generators at TECO-Westinghouse will remain in Texas. They are preparing to box them up and put them in a storage facility there until WSF decides what to do with the unusable equipment.
Statement to KING-TV from Assistant Secretary for Washington State Ferries David Moseley
Washington State Ferries has an unparalleled safety record. I would never put our passengers or employees at risk; safety is the number one priority of the organization. In the nearly 60 years that we have operated the ferry system, our safety record is equal to or exceeds any other ferry system in the world. Our 23 million annual passengers can count on our state ferries to deliver them safely to and from their destinations.
We have excellent engine room staff responsible for operations on the Super class vessels. There are no reports concerning any safety issues regarding the propulsion generators on the Kaleetan and Yakima.
Furthermore, the potential for this issue does not exist on any other vessels in the fleet because the nature of the power and/or the configurations of the propulsion plants on other vessels are different.
In 2007, Secretary Hammond demonstrated the department's willingness to put safety first when she withdrew the Steel Electrics from service when there was an issue of concern. Any suggestion that the ferry system would ever compromise the safety of our passengers or employees is unfounded as demonstrated by our record and actions.
Sourse: King5.com -
http://www.king5.com/news/investigators/Investigators-Millions-spent-on-ferry-generators-that-cant-be-used-100081499.html
COUNTY WASTE
Cash-strapped Metro now going after drivers' salaries
Some drivers' annual salaries are as high as $60,000 to $115,000!
September 7, 2010 | By Mike Lindblom | Seattle Times Transportation Reporter
NEW
After two years of tapping reserves, boosting fares, surviving on federal grants and postponing new routes, King County Metro Transit managers
now are looking behind the wheel for savings.
Metro drivers rank third nationally in wages, with a top rate of $28.47 an hour, and the average yearly income, including overtime, is almost
$61,000 a year, according to a Metro review that includes full- and part-time drivers.
Because of cost-of-living raises in the union contract, drivers' pay rose nearly 4 percent each year over the past five years. Union leaders say
the growth merely brings drivers back to a reasonable standard of living, after losing ground in the 1990s.
Driver pay has become a touchy issue because the current contract expires Oct. 31, and the county government is seeking to suspend automatic cost-of-living increases.
Paul Bachtel, president of Amalgamated Transit Union Local 587, said Tuesday that skipping a 2011 inflation raise is unacceptable, unless the
new contract offers substantial raises in later years. He said it would be better to trim routes or cut management.
Other options, Metro says, include layoffs, shorter break times between trips (causing risks of late arrivals) or service cuts, to start in early 2011.
Read more...
Drivers cannot strike.
So the final contract is likely to be decided through hearings, by an arbitrator, Bachtel said.
In other county departments, Executive Dow Constantine has frozen pay for managers and has praised unions that stopped taking inflation raises.
The Washington Policy Center, a conservative think tank, in July poured fuel on the fire with a paper that called Metro driver pay "out of control."
Analyst Mike Ennis blamed raises and overtime pay for Metro's failure to deliver most of the new bus service it promised voters in the Transit Now sales-tax
measure of 2006 and an earlier measure in 2001.
"While taxpayers and transit users have not received what they were promised, one group has benefited from the two tax increases, public bus drivers," Ennis wrote.
County Council member Larry Phillips, of northwest Seattle, blamed Wall Street and the deep recession for decimating local tax income, so Metro will collect
$213 million less than originally planned for 2010-11.
"The world changed in October 2008, and I don't think it was working people who caused it," said Phillips, a transit backer who oversaw recent performance audits.
"Why blame the operators for economic Armageddon?"
Meanwhile, bus drivers in Seattle trail only Boston and San Jose, while ranking just ahead of New York and San Francisco in top pay.
It's a good time to be a driver in Washington state, where even smaller agencies pay as well as the biggest U.S. bus agencies in other states. Eight in
Washington — including in Everett and Tacoma and at Community Transit in Snohomish County — pay more than the $22.22-per-hour wage in Los Angeles.
Skill and patience
Many drivers are incensed at the claim they're overpaid.
The job requires little formal education, but considerable skill, stamina and patience. Metro had a driver shortage a few years ago.
"I do believe we're worth it," veteran driver Lisa Thompson said, "because we work a lot of crazy hours, there are a lot of things coming at us nonstop
from the public, reroutes and traffic. At any given moment you've got to make a lot of decisions, stay calm, not escalate a lot of things, and stay on time."
Operators start as part-timers, guaranteed only 2 ˝ hours a day and frequently working split shifts. A new driver typically needs six years to reach top scale.
"Because there was a future, I hung in there. It's sort of an investment," said Thompson, a single mom when she started as a part-time driver in 1995.
Base pay for a top-scale driver is nearly $60,000 a year before overtime. Last year, 255 drivers made more than $75,000, with 20 of those topping $100,000.
Metro's highest-paid driver made $115,716 in 2009.
Metro drivers also operate Sound Transit trains and express buses within King County.
Job hazards include back injuries from awkward sitting positions, stress from deadlines, inability to take restroom breaks at will and assault. Driver Katherine
Batey, 57, was knocked unconscious by a teenage rider in January on Route 124 in Tukwila and is still unable to work.
The current contract included inflation raises of 3 percent in November 2008, 1 percent in May 2009 and 3 percent in November. Seattle's high housing prices were
one argument for higher pay, Bachtel said.
Metro has the nation's seventh-highest bus ridership and the fastest ridership growth in the past decade.
"A lot of people have been asked to work more time, to meet the needs of the system," said Carl Jackson, a streetcar supervisor and union member.
The average pay, including part-timers', rose by 38.5 percent from 2000 to 2009, compared with 25 percent inflation, and now averages $60,806, including overtime,
a Metro study says.
Freeze or cuts?
Will there be a wage freeze or even cuts next year?
Jim Jacobson, Metro deputy general manager, won't discuss figures. But he emphasized the driver contracts have given cost-of-living boosts since 1998. Employees
also receive "step" increases yearly as they gain experience.
The county did send a letter this summer seeking to forgo inflation raises in 2011, in exchange for preventing layoffs, but the union balked.
Bachtel said Metro isn't like United Airlines, which needed wage concessions to stay in business. "They [drivers] don't expect to give up wages, benefits, working
conditions, when the transit agency could cut some of its services, and not take away pay."
Driver wages make up about one-quarter of the agency's $600 million annual spending. Based on 2010 salaries and workloads, each 1 percent increase for drivers
would increase Metro's labor costs by more than $1.4 million.
Among the nearly 2,300 drivers, you would expect diverse views.
Thompson said she would rather work fewer hours than see colleagues be laid off.
Full-time driver Alejandro Cumplido said he was glad to survive 2009, when the recession first became a threat.
"If I don't get laid off personally, I'm satisfied," he said while delayed at a crime scene in West Seattle early Saturday. "It would be nice to have a $2 to $3
raise right now, but I'd rather keep my job."
Jeff Welch, a part-time driver who writes Puget Sound Transit Operators Blog, has waged a war of words with the union about overtime. Welch accuses leaders of
negotiating contracts that steer extra hours to senior full-timers, while part-timers lack for work.
Bachtel replies there should be growth for both groups — a county audit suggests more overtime, to reduce the expense to hire more full- and part-time employees
who receive benefits.
"RapidRide"
Despite the recession, Metro says, it nonetheless will launch its "RapidRide" system of roomier, more frequent express buses in six corridors, while other routes are trimmed.
Metro must show greater financial discipline if it expects elected officials and voters to approve tax-increase proposals for transit, said Bellevue Councilman
Grant Degginger, who sits on a transit task force.
That means not only reining in bus-driver costs, but salaries for managers, he said. "Costs for the Metro system generally are higher than the average nationally."
Welch said political rancor hasn't filtered down to the streets, where he said he finds most riders in all parts of town to be polite and thankful.
More than most big-city agencies, Metro focuses its driver hours to serve the most commuters — which translates into irregular shift schedules and hundreds of
part-timers who make less than the average pay.
"Especially if they're riding peak hour," Welch said, "They're riding with somebody who is just getting by."
Sourse: SeattleTimes.com -
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2012834601_metrodriver08m.html#Scene_1
Mike Lindblom: 206-515-5631 or mlindblom@seattletimes.com
Give Us More Money and We Will Give You More Buses
July 30, 2010 | Washington Policy Center
Remember that promise from King County Metro when they asked the voters to approve a 0.2% sales tax increase that was to fund 575,000 hours of new
bus service for the county system over the next 6 years. Then in 2006 they came back, no doubt thinking voters would have forgotten 2000 promises,
and asked for a 0.1% sales tax increase that they said would fund another? 700,000 hours in new bus service over the next 10 years.
In 2000 they were providing 3.24 million hours of bus service. By 2006 they had increased bus service by 207,257 hours, nearly 368,000 hours short
of the promise - nearly half of it delivered by the second tax increase. They actually collected 96% of the projected sales revenues from the 2000
increase and overall 119% of the revenue through 2009 that had been projected including the second tax increase. Yet they provided only 32% increase
in bus hours.
The obvious question is "where's the money"?
The answer is largely salaries and benefits for the employees. Here is where one of our readers may want to correct me if the information is wrong.
But it comes from public records. In 2000 they had 2,671 drivers with an average salary of $29,641. Not really all that much greater than the average
Joe in King County. After the two sales tax increases the average salary for the now 2,857 drivers had increased to $47,170 - a 60% increase with
inflation increasing 25% over the same period. Don't forget that there are also administrators who never set foot in a bus who have probably done better
than the drivers.
See the
Washington Policy Center report written by Mike Ennis.
Light Rail - is it good for you?
July 30, 2010 | Washington Policy Center
Back in 1996 the Sound Transit promoters promised voters that they could build 25 miles of light rail for a total cost of $1.5 Billion and it would be
finished in 2006, In 2009 they opened the first link. They have now delivered 17 miles for $2.6 billion and won't be finished until about 2020 at an
additional cost of $15 billion. In 1996 they promised if voters do not vote to extend the system they would roll back the tax used to cover the costs.
In 2007 the voters rejected the plan to add highways and the extended light rail for $18 billion. The voters rejected the plan. They not only did not
roll back the tax they re-submitted the plan but excluded highways at the same $18 billion and the measure passed. No doubt the Obama wave didn't hurt
their effort. It is the Democrats in Seattle who want to ride the heavily subsidized Light Rail and eventually they hope to be able to take their bikes
out to the countryside for quiet rides through lands that owners have been forbidden to develop.
Despite being years behind and billions of dollars over budget you will keep hearing Sound Transit and the Democrat promoters tell us that they are on
schedule and under budget. Only because they keep changing the numbers and the targets to fit.
They estimated that light rail would carry 32 million riders per year and 107,000 per weekday by 2010. The reality is they are carrying about 20,000
riders daily and carried an estimated 6 million the first year. There is a capacity to carry 22,000 passengers per hour per direction but is actually
carrying 425. They also promised that the ridership would pay 53% of the costs of operation (we the taxpayers to cover the rest) They are now claiming
that riders will cover 40% but seem to be actually collecting even less than this. As far as on-time performance, they are running 71% while other modes
such as the bus system are at 90%. You will know that that must mean if you have ever ridden the bus.
Again, to see more on this issue, read the
Washington Policy Center report written by Mike Ennis.
|